Our digital addiction is costing the planet dearly | Letters
                        
                        
                        
                            Tue, 11 Feb 2025, 17:08
                            
                        
                    Full Content
                        
                            
                                Full article content available
                            
                        
                    The arrival of the Chinese DeepSeek AI app, which, according to a detailed comparison by
, has a drastically reduced environmental impact of 90% less energy and 92% lower carbon footprint than its main rival, ChatGPT, has highlighted the immense energy use of servers across the world that keep the internet running (The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow, 28 January
). According to a report in June 2023 bythe Columbia Climate School
, internet use accounts for between 2.5% and 3.7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, exceeding those of the aviation industry, so with increased use of AI it has almost certainly risen since then.With undeleted emails going back years and trillions of forgotten photographs stored in the cloud, we are all guilty of contributing to this. I suggest, therefore, that instead of just sanctimoniously sitting around a candle at home on
(22 April), we spend the time deleting anything from our digital history that is unwanted, and then build this discipline into a regular routine. An alternative toBuy Nothing Day
, it could catch on and make us feel a tiny bit more comfortable about our digital addictions.Patrick Cosgrove
Bucknell, Shropshire
• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please
us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our
letters
section.
AI Model Selection
                        Avg. Response: 10.0s
                    
                Llama3.2:1b
MetaSize: 1B
                                Success Rate: 100.0%
                            Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF
MetaSize: 1B
                                Success Rate: 100.0%
                            llama3.2:latest
MetaSize: 3B
                                Success Rate: 100.0%
                            
                    All models run locally on our servers. Response times may vary based on server load.