Don’t be fooled. Copenhagen is not that green | Letters

Wed, 18 Dec 2024, 17:51
Full Content
Full article content available

While the urge to write positive stories about solutions to the climate crisis must be strong, and they are needed, Copenhagen should not be one (

The five-minute city: inside Denmark’s revolutionary neighbourhood, 10 December

). Nordhavn may be a revolutionary neighbourhood, but to say that Copenhagen is a green city is based on false premises.

Near Nordhavn, a massive artificial island,

Lynetteholmen

, is being built that will wreak havoc on the marine environment and lead to massive

amounts of CO2

in the atmosphere, and was approved by

dubious means

, with only

8% of the city’s population

wanting it.

Furthermore, claims that Copenhagen’s centralised district heating helped it reduce emissions by 75% are based on the fact that it imports

huge quantities of forest biomass

from countries such as Estonia and Latvia, with detrimental effects to their forests and biodiversity, and the idea that burning it is carbon-neutral,

which it is not

.

The promotion of Copenhagen

as a green city

is one of the reasons for a large increase in the number of tourists who come here by

cruise ship

or

by plane

, both travel forms that can by no means be considered sustainable. There are even plans to

expand the airport

, with no regard to what that means for the climate or

the local population

.

And finally, the last small pieces of nature in the Copenhagen area are being destroyed in order to build new houses, again with no regard to what the

population wants

. So, while Copenhagen is by no means the worst city in the world, one should be careful before describing it as a sustainable city and a role model for others to follow.

Tobias Jespersen


Copenhagen, Denmark

• I live not far from this new part of Copenhagen and, like many others, have witnessed the soulless expansion of the capital – similar to the one I witnessed in London when I lived there in the 1980s. Yes, it’s centrally located, and yes, many now have a pleasant view of the harbour. But the brutalist architecture is completely devoid of any charm, atmosphere, originality or beauty. None of it is sustainable or built to last – it’s cheap, fast building blocks smacked together for a quick profit. I doubt that any of the planners, architects or investors in these projects live there.

Morten Iversen


Copenhagen, Denmark

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please

email

us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our

letters

section.

AI Model Selection

Avg. Response: 10.0s

Llama3.2:1b

Meta
Default
Size: 1B
Success Rate: 100.0%

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-GGUF

Meta
Size: 1B
Success Rate: 100.0%
All models run locally on our servers. Response times may vary based on server load.